|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 47-50
Hypopigmented macules following quality-switched 1064 nm laser hair removal: A retrospective study
Ibrahim A ALOmair1, Yasser A Ghobara2, Saad AlTalhab2, Ahmed Alissa2, Mohammed I AlJasser3
1 Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Derma Clinic, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Division of Dermatology, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||07-Sep-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||10-Oct-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||27-Mar-2020|
Dr. Ibrahim A ALOmair
Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, P O Box 7544, Riyadh 13317-4233
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: Laser hair removal (LHR) is a common procedure in dermatology. LHR using quality-switched (QS) 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) is very popular in our community despite lack of sufficient evidence on its efficacy and safety. Purpose: We report the characteristics of nine patients who developed hypopigmented macules after being treated with QS 1064 nm laser for hair removal. Methods: This was a retrospective study at a laser center in Saudi Arabia conducted between June 2014 and September 2018. Patients who developed white macules following treatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for removal of unwanted hair were included in the study. Results: All patients were Saudi females with a mean age of 28.8 years (range: 25–37 years). Well-defined hypopigmented to depigmented 1–3 mm macules developed after being treated with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for hair removal. The most commonly affected area was the face. Majority of patients had skin phototype IV. Hypopigmented macules developed after an average of 22 laser sessions (range: 4–48 sessions). None of the patients had either personal or family history of vitiligo. Lesions seem to be difficult to treat, with only two patients responding to topical tacrolimus and excimer laser. Conclusion: Hypopigmented macules might develop after QS 1064 nm LHR. Those macules appear to be resistant to treatment. Further prospective controlled studies needed to elaborate more on the safety profile of this procedure.
Keywords: 1064 nm, depigmentation, hypopigmentation, laser hair removal, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet, quality-switched
|How to cite this article:|
ALOmair IA, Ghobara YA, AlTalhab S, Alissa A, AlJasser MI. Hypopigmented macules following quality-switched 1064 nm laser hair removal: A retrospective study. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 2020;24:47-50
|How to cite this URL:|
ALOmair IA, Ghobara YA, AlTalhab S, Alissa A, AlJasser MI. Hypopigmented macules following quality-switched 1064 nm laser hair removal: A retrospective study. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 21];24:47-50. Available from: http://www.jddsjournal.org/text.asp?2020/24/1/47/281425
| Introduction|| |
Laser hair removal (LHR) is a common procedure in dermatology. It is considered a safe and effective method for the removal of unwanted hair for cosmetic and medical reasons such as hirsutism. The use of laser for hair removal can lead to improvement in the quality of life in some patients. LHR is typically performed with different wavelengths in a long-pulsed mode.
Quality-switched (QS) lasers, including QS 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, are used to treat different pigmentary skin conditions such as nevus of Ota, tattoos, and melasma., QS 1064 nm laser has been evaluated only in a few studies for hair removal.,
LHR using QS 1064 nm is very popular in our community despite the lack of sufficient evidence on its efficacy and safety. QS LHR has several advantages over conventional long-pulsed laser therapy; those include less associated pain, faster procedure, and possibly lower risk of paradoxical hypertrichosis when treating vellus hair. However, we have noticed that some patients develop treatment-resistant hypopigmentation. Hence, we report the characteristics of nine patients who developed hypopigmented macules after being treated with QS 1064 nm laser for hair removal.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This was a retrospective study at a laser center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board. Medical records of all patients who had white macules following treatment with QS-1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for removal of unwanted hair between June 2014 and September 2018 were reviewed. Skin type, duration of lesions, number of laser sessions, history of vitiligo, comorbidities, and the details of prescribed treatment were obtained for all patients. Data missing from medical records were gathered from clinical photographs and by contacting patients by phone.
| Results|| |
A total of nine patients were identified [Table 1]. All patients were Saudi females with a mean age of 28.8 years (range: 25–37 years). The Fitzpatrick skin type ranged from III to V, with the majority having skin phototype IV (66%). The face was affected in all cases [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. Upper limb and neck involvement were observed in some patients [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Lesions were typically well-defined hypopigmented to depigmented 1–3 mm macules. All patients had treatment with QS1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for removal of unwanted hair in those areas with hypopigmented macules. Laser treatments were performed outside our laser center, so the used laser parameters were not available. Disease duration was variable among the study patients ranging from 2 months to over 5 years. Hypopigmented macules developed after an average of 22 laser sessions (range: 4–48 sessions). None of the patients had either personal or family history of vitiligo. No comorbidities were reported except for hypothyroidism in one patient and iron deficiency anemia in another. Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment was prescribed in the majority of patients, which resulted in complete resolution in one patient. Narrowband ultraviolet B, topical corticosteroids, and bimatoprost 0.03% solution were added in some of the patients without additional improvement. One patient significantly improved after a 5-month treatment with a combination of excimer laser and tacrolimus 0.1% ointment.
|Figure 1: Patient number 1. Multiple hypopigmented round 1–3 mm macules affecting the forehead and perioral area|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Patient number 2. Multiple ill-defined hypopigmented macules affecting the forehead and the neck|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Patient number 3. Hypopigmented ill-defined macules localized to the right cheek and the forearm|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Patient number 4. Mottled hypopigmented-to-depigmented macules on the forehead and the left cheek|
Click here to view
|Figure 5: Patient number 5. 1–2 mm hypopigmented macules on the right cheek and the perioral area|
Click here to view
|Figure 6: Patient number 6. Mild ill-defined hypopigmented macules affecting the chin area|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Lasers play a major role in medical and esthetic dermatology. Laser-assisted epilation is one of the most prevalent procedures in dermatology clinics worldwide. This is due to its many advantages such as high patient satisfaction rate, safety, and longevity of the results,, in comparison with the other traditional methods of hair removal. Long-pulsed lasers are commonly used for hair removal, especially alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers with good safety profile even in patients with darker skin colors. This is due to their longer wavelengths which avoid the competition with epidermal melanin., QS lasers are used to treat various skin conditions such as nevus of Ota, and tattoos.,
To the best of our knowledge, QS 1064 Nd:YAG laser is not commonly used for hair removal with only a few published studies. In Saudi Arabia, hair removal is commonly performed using QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. This method is widely used compared to long-pulsed lasers possibly due to a favorable side effect profile including less associated pain. In addition, it is a preferred method to treat vellus hair due to a theoretical lower risk of paradoxical hypertrichosis. As a hair removal device, QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG is commonly used with the following parameters: spot size 4–6 mm, fluence 2–3 J/cm2, and frequency of 10 Hz. Laser sessions are usually performed every 6–8 weeks.
Unfortunately, QS lasers have several reported side effects including pigmentary changes. Liu and Huo reported a patient with permanent leukotrichia after treating a tattoo with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. Depigmented facial macules were reported following treatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for melasma and rejuvenation. We report nine female patients who underwent treatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser complicated by the development of multiple hypopigmented to depigmented macules on the treated sites. Most of them developed over the face after several laser sessions. Lesions seem to be difficult to treat with only two patients responding to topical tacrolimus and excimer laser. Kim et al. have reported a patient with punctate leukoderma posttreatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for melasma which responded well to excimer laser.
The mechanism of this complication is most probably due to the destruction of the epidermal melanocytes. It is not necessarily to be associated with high fluence, as it has been reported with low fluence laser toning for the treatment of melasma. This can be explained by cumulative melanocyte toxicity which can result in melanocyte destruction after multiple sessions.
Al-Orainni et al. have reported four similar patients with facial depigmented macules following the treatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for hair removal. Up to our knowledge, this is the largest number of patients with this complication following treatment with QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for hair epilation.
| Conclusion|| |
We are reporting this complication to increase the awareness about possible side effects of QS 1064 nm Nd:YAG LHR. We also encourage further, larger, and prospective controlled studies to elaborate more on the safety profile of this procedure.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Lee CM. Laser-assisted hair removal for facial hirsutism in women: A review of evidence. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2018;20:140-4.
Liu Y, Zeng W, Geng S. A retrospective study on the characteristics of treating nevus of ota by 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser. Indian J Dermatol 2016;61:347.
] [Full text]
Lakshmi C, Krishnaswamy G. Efficacy of the Q-switched neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet laser in the treatment of blue-black amateur and professional tattoos. Indian J Dermatol 2015;60:578-83.
] [Full text]
Saleh F, Moftah NH, Abdel-Azim E, Gharieb MG. Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone or with modified Jessner chemical peeling for treatment of mixed melasma in dark skin types: A comparative clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2018;17:319-27.
Yue B, Yang Q, Xu J, Lu Z. Efficacy and safety of fractional Q-switched 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser in the treatment of melasma in Chinese patients. Lasers Med Sci 2016;31:1657-63.
Goldberg DJ, Samady JA. Evaluation of a long-pulse Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for hair removal. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:109-13.
Nanni CA, Alster TS. A practical review of laser-assisted hair removal using the Q-switched Nd: YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers. Dermatol Surg 1998;24:1399-405.
Chuang GS, Farinelli W, Christiani DC, Herrick RF, Lee NC, Avram MM. Gaseous and particulate content of laser hair removal plume. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152:1320-6.
Vachiramon V, Brown T, McMichael AJ. Patient satisfaction and complications following laser hair removal in ethnic skin. J Drugs Dermatol 2012;11:191-5.
Fayne RA, Perper M, Eber AE, Aldahan AS, Nouri K. Laser and light treatments for hair reduction in fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI: A comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Clin Dermatol 2018;19:237-52.
Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:9-20.
Kar HK, Gupta L 1064 nm Q switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of ota: An Indian open label prospective study of 50 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:565-70.
Haik J, Kornhaber R, Harats M, Israeli H, Orenstein A. Q-Switched Nd:YAG laser removal of facial amateur tattoos in patients with fitzpatrick type VI: Case series. J Drugs Dermatol 2016;15:1448-52.
Nanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: Side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:165-71.
Liu XJ, Huo MH. Permanent leukotrichia after Q-switched 1064 nm laser tattoo removal. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2011;77:81-2.
] [Full text]
Chan NP, Ho SG, Shek SY, Yeung CK, Chan HH. A case series of facial depigmentation associated with low fluence Q-switched 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser for skin rejuvenation and melasma. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42:712-9.
Kim HS, Jung HD, Kim HO, Lee JY, Park YM. Punctate leucoderma after low-fluence 1,064-nm quality-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser therapy successfully managed using a 308-nm excimer laser. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:821-3.
Al-Orainni H, Ghobara Y, Al-Issa A. Hypopigmentation secondary to hair removal by quality-switched 1064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet: A case series. Int J Med Sci Public Health2017;6:1119-21.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]